https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238815 The appellant's claim for Cenvat credit on excise duty paid on certain goods used for providing output services of erection, installation, and commissioning was contested by Revenue, arguing that creating immovable property disqualifies the claim. The court acknowledged the link between the services provided and the creation of immovable property but noted that the amendment excluding such items from Cenvat credit did not apply to the periods in question. Consequently, the stay application was allowed, waiving the pre-deposit until a specified date or appeal disposal. en-us Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238815 The appellant's claim for Cenvat credit on excise duty paid on certain goods used for providing output services of erection, installation, and commissioning was contested by Revenue, arguing that creating immovable property disqualifies the claim. The court acknowledged the link between the services provided and the creation of immovable property but noted that the amendment excluding such items from Cenvat credit did not apply to the periods in question. Consequently, the stay application was allowed, waiving the pre-deposit until a specified date or appeal disposal. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238815