<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1265 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238810</link>
    <description>At the interim stage, the tribunal found a prima facie case on limitation for the CENVAT credit demand because the ST-3 returns had regularly disclosed credit taken and utilised. The storage and warehousing exemption was not made out prima facie, as soya bean meal was treated as a processing residue rather than agricultural produce, and the invoices suggested stock management charges linked to quantity rather than mere rent. The appellant was therefore put to terms, and a reduced pre-deposit was accepted. On deposit, the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the remaining dues was stayed during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1265 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238810</link>
      <description>At the interim stage, the tribunal found a prima facie case on limitation for the CENVAT credit demand because the ST-3 returns had regularly disclosed credit taken and utilised. The storage and warehousing exemption was not made out prima facie, as soya bean meal was treated as a processing residue rather than agricultural produce, and the invoices suggested stock management charges linked to quantity rather than mere rent. The appellant was therefore put to terms, and a reduced pre-deposit was accepted. On deposit, the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the remaining dues was stayed during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>