<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1254 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238799</link>
    <description>The Court granted sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, between the Petitioner Transferor company and the Transferee company. Approval was based on positive reports from the Regional Director and Official Liquidator, absence of objections, and compliance with statutory requirements. The order mandated the transfer of assets, liabilities, and dissolution of the Transferor company without winding up, with parties required to fulfill stamp duty, tax obligations, and legal requirements. The Petitioner Transferor company also agreed to deposit funds in the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator voluntarily.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1254 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238799</link>
      <description>The Court granted sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, between the Petitioner Transferor company and the Transferee company. Approval was based on positive reports from the Regional Director and Official Liquidator, absence of objections, and compliance with statutory requirements. The order mandated the transfer of assets, liabilities, and dissolution of the Transferor company without winding up, with parties required to fulfill stamp duty, tax obligations, and legal requirements. The Petitioner Transferor company also agreed to deposit funds in the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator voluntarily.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>