https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238798 The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower court's decision in C.P. No.113/94 involving M/s. India Insulator Ltd. The judgment held that the security agency, Respondent No.1, could not be held liable for missing assets as the premises were sealed during their tenure. The Court emphasized the lack of merit in the Appellant's claims and concluded that the appeal lacked substance, resulting in a dismissal without cost orders. en-us Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238798 The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lower court's decision in C.P. No.113/94 involving M/s. India Insulator Ltd. The judgment held that the security agency, Respondent No.1, could not be held liable for missing assets as the premises were sealed during their tenure. The Court emphasized the lack of merit in the Appellant's claims and concluded that the appeal lacked substance, resulting in a dismissal without cost orders. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 08 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238798