https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238793 The court concluded that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the petitioner's application for restoration of the appeal. Given that the Revenue was granted permission to appeal on the same issue, the petitioner should also be allowed to pursue their appeal. The court allowed the petition, set aside the Tribunal's order dated 26th September 2012, and restored the petitioner's appeal and stay petition to their original numbers before the CESTAT, East Zonal Bench, Kolkata. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238793 The court concluded that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the petitioner's application for restoration of the appeal. Given that the Revenue was granted permission to appeal on the same issue, the petitioner should also be allowed to pursue their appeal. The court allowed the petition, set aside the Tribunal's order dated 26th September 2012, and restored the petitioner's appeal and stay petition to their original numbers before the CESTAT, East Zonal Bench, Kolkata. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238793