<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 395 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158546</link>
    <description>The impugned notice was treated as a notice under the Act, and the Assessing Authority was required to determine the petitioners&#039; tax liability afresh under the law as applicable at the relevant time. In light of the Supreme Court decision relied upon, the issues raised became academic, and the writ petitions were disposed of without any substantive adjudication on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:34:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 395 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158546</link>
      <description>The impugned notice was treated as a notice under the Act, and the Assessing Authority was required to determine the petitioners&#039; tax liability afresh under the law as applicable at the relevant time. In light of the Supreme Court decision relied upon, the issues raised became academic, and the writ petitions were disposed of without any substantive adjudication on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>