<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1216 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238761</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit Rs.5,00,000 within six weeks, with the remaining dues waived upon compliance. Recovery was stayed during the appeal, considering the tax was prima facie payable as per the agreement with franchisees. The limitation argument raised by the applicant&#039;s counsel would be further assessed during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1216 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238761</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit Rs.5,00,000 within six weeks, with the remaining dues waived upon compliance. Recovery was stayed during the appeal, considering the tax was prima facie payable as per the agreement with franchisees. The limitation argument raised by the applicant&#039;s counsel would be further assessed during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>