<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1211 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238756</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed stay applications for disposal of substantive appeals, including appeals against service tax, interest, and penalty orders. The appellant, classified as a &quot;Real Estate Agent,&quot; faced penalties under the Finance Act 1994. The appeal was initially dismissed for failure of pre-deposit but later reinstated, requiring the appellant to deposit the tax liability and interest within six weeks. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1211 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238756</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed stay applications for disposal of substantive appeals, including appeals against service tax, interest, and penalty orders. The appellant, classified as a &quot;Real Estate Agent,&quot; faced penalties under the Finance Act 1994. The appeal was initially dismissed for failure of pre-deposit but later reinstated, requiring the appellant to deposit the tax liability and interest within six weeks. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>