<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1210 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238755</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over the applicability of Service Tax rates on commercial training services provided by Mercedes Benz India Ltd. The appellant argued for different tax rates based on the date of service provision, but the Tribunal ruled that the rate applicable on the date of service provision should determine the tax liability, not the billing or payment date. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of the date of service provision for determining Service Tax rates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1210 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238755</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over the applicability of Service Tax rates on commercial training services provided by Mercedes Benz India Ltd. The appellant argued for different tax rates based on the date of service provision, but the Tribunal ruled that the rate applicable on the date of service provision should determine the tax liability, not the billing or payment date. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of the date of service provision for determining Service Tax rates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>