<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1208 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238753</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore found in favor of the appellant in the case concerning the admissibility of deduction of material value under Notification No.12/2003-ST for &#039;commercial or industrial construction&#039; services. The Tribunal determined that the appellant had demonstrated prima facie that materials were sold, meeting the Notification&#039;s requirements, based on detailed examination of invoices and VAT regulations. Consequently, the requirement of predeposit was waived, and a stay against recovery was granted pending further statutory provisions review. The Tribunal did not provide a specific ruling on the imposition of penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, as its focus was primarily on the deduction issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1208 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238753</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore found in favor of the appellant in the case concerning the admissibility of deduction of material value under Notification No.12/2003-ST for &#039;commercial or industrial construction&#039; services. The Tribunal determined that the appellant had demonstrated prima facie that materials were sold, meeting the Notification&#039;s requirements, based on detailed examination of invoices and VAT regulations. Consequently, the requirement of predeposit was waived, and a stay against recovery was granted pending further statutory provisions review. The Tribunal did not provide a specific ruling on the imposition of penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, as its focus was primarily on the deduction issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>