https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238746 The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the appellant's application by the Settlement Commission due to failure to present a clean case. The appellant's concerns about adjudication based on materials from a different importer were dismissed, with emphasis placed on the gravity of undervaluation allegations. Specific directions were issued for the appellant to make deposits in installments to address financial difficulties and ensure compliance. Failure to adhere to deposit schedules would lead to vacation of orders, highlighting the importance of timely action in meeting deposit requirements outlined by the Tribunal. en-us Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238746 The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the appellant's application by the Settlement Commission due to failure to present a clean case. The appellant's concerns about adjudication based on materials from a different importer were dismissed, with emphasis placed on the gravity of undervaluation allegations. Specific directions were issued for the appellant to make deposits in installments to address financial difficulties and ensure compliance. Failure to adhere to deposit schedules would lead to vacation of orders, highlighting the importance of timely action in meeting deposit requirements outlined by the Tribunal. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238746