<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1198 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238743</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the application under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the Scheme of Amalgamation of two companies. The Court dispensed with the requirement of convening and holding meetings of secured and unsecured creditors of the Applicant companies based on the submissions and legal precedents cited. The application was allowed in the terms mentioned, and the order was to be given dasti.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1198 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238743</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the application under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the Scheme of Amalgamation of two companies. The Court dispensed with the requirement of convening and holding meetings of secured and unsecured creditors of the Applicant companies based on the submissions and legal precedents cited. The application was allowed in the terms mentioned, and the order was to be given dasti.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>