<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1195 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238740</link>
    <description>The Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court allowed the condonation of a 146-day delay in filing the appeal, accepting the appellant&#039;s reasons related to a prior writ petition. Additionally, the court set aside the order passed by CESTAT, New Delhi, based on a similar case precedent where the impugned order had been modified. The court directed that the appeals should be heard on merits regardless of the directed amount deposited, aligning with the precedent established in the cited case dated 31.05.2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2015 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1195 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238740</link>
      <description>The Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court allowed the condonation of a 146-day delay in filing the appeal, accepting the appellant&#039;s reasons related to a prior writ petition. Additionally, the court set aside the order passed by CESTAT, New Delhi, based on a similar case precedent where the impugned order had been modified. The court directed that the appeals should be heard on merits regardless of the directed amount deposited, aligning with the precedent established in the cited case dated 31.05.2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>