<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 410 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158526</link>
    <description>Declared goods under the Central Sales Tax framework remain subject to single-stage taxation where their essential commercial identity is unchanged; cut pieces of cast iron and steel angles were therefore not a new taxable commodity, and the sale levy was unsustainable. Bagasse, as the residue of crushed sugarcane, likewise did not acquire a separate taxable identity, and sales tax could not be imposed again where purchase tax had already attached to the sugarcane. Account books could not be rejected merely because a credit memo was not immediately converted into a bill, since no accounting rule required contemporaneous billing and the books were otherwise regularly maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:45:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 410 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158526</link>
      <description>Declared goods under the Central Sales Tax framework remain subject to single-stage taxation where their essential commercial identity is unchanged; cut pieces of cast iron and steel angles were therefore not a new taxable commodity, and the sale levy was unsustainable. Bagasse, as the residue of crushed sugarcane, likewise did not acquire a separate taxable identity, and sales tax could not be imposed again where purchase tax had already attached to the sugarcane. Account books could not be rejected merely because a credit memo was not immediately converted into a bill, since no accounting rule required contemporaneous billing and the books were otherwise regularly maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>