<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 412 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158520</link>
    <description>An appellate authority should not keep a review petition undecided while coercive recovery action is being pursued, as inaction can frustrate the pending review process. The Court therefore directed the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Faridabad, to hear and decide the review petition within fifteen days from submission of the order copy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:21:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 412 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158520</link>
      <description>An appellate authority should not keep a review petition undecided while coercive recovery action is being pursued, as inaction can frustrate the pending review process. The Court therefore directed the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Faridabad, to hear and decide the review petition within fifteen days from submission of the order copy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>