https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158519 A filing defect in not enclosing the impugned order was treated as procedural, so it did not by itself defeat maintainability and the amendment was read with the original petition. However, extraordinary jurisdiction was declined because an effective statutory appeal under the taxing law was available and the dispute turned on unresolved factual questions, including the commencement of commercial production. The Tribunal therefore held that the applicant should pursue the ordinary statutory remedy before the competent forum, and it did not decide the separate jurisdictional question under the Central Sales Tax order once non-entertainment followed. en-us Mon, 01 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:10:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158519 A filing defect in not enclosing the impugned order was treated as procedural, so it did not by itself defeat maintainability and the amendment was read with the original petition. However, extraordinary jurisdiction was declined because an effective statutory appeal under the taxing law was available and the dispute turned on unresolved factual questions, including the commencement of commercial production. The Tribunal therefore held that the applicant should pursue the ordinary statutory remedy before the competent forum, and it did not decide the separate jurisdictional question under the Central Sales Tax order once non-entertainment followed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 01 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158519