<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1180 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238725</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, ruling in favor of the revenue authorities and dismissing the appellant&#039;s claims for additional barge freight under the mercantile system of accounting, higher depreciation for trucks given on lease basis, and interpretation of Explanation (baa) to section 80HHC regarding receipts linked with export business. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1180 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238725</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, ruling in favor of the revenue authorities and dismissing the appellant&#039;s claims for additional barge freight under the mercantile system of accounting, higher depreciation for trucks given on lease basis, and interpretation of Explanation (baa) to section 80HHC regarding receipts linked with export business. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>