<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 357 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158469</link>
    <description>Contractual supply of building materials to contractors and fabricators under agreed rates, with value adjusted against contract dues and ownership retained until use, constituted a sale under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958. Applying the contractual terms and the governing sale definition, the Court held the assessee was a dealer and the transactions were taxable. The exemption notification in question applied only to purchase tax on specified goods used in construction for Government or public sector bodies; it did not extend to sales tax and could not be widened by implication. The assessee was therefore not entitled to exemption, and the tax liability on the disputed supplies was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:26:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 357 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158469</link>
      <description>Contractual supply of building materials to contractors and fabricators under agreed rates, with value adjusted against contract dues and ownership retained until use, constituted a sale under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958. Applying the contractual terms and the governing sale definition, the Court held the assessee was a dealer and the transactions were taxable. The exemption notification in question applied only to purchase tax on specified goods used in construction for Government or public sector bodies; it did not extend to sales tax and could not be widened by implication. The assessee was therefore not entitled to exemption, and the tax liability on the disputed supplies was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>