<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 404 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158452</link>
    <description>Deduction certificates issued by Government departments under the sales tax deduction-at-source mechanism had to be accepted in place of treasury challans, crossed cheques or demand drafts required under the return procedure. Where the assessee produced such certificates and its registration and departmental recognition supported the claim, the tax officer could not insist on separate remittance proof from the assessee. That would undermine the Government-approved method of tax deduction at source. The amounts deducted were therefore required to be credited and adjusted against the assessee&#039;s sales tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:13:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 404 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158452</link>
      <description>Deduction certificates issued by Government departments under the sales tax deduction-at-source mechanism had to be accepted in place of treasury challans, crossed cheques or demand drafts required under the return procedure. Where the assessee produced such certificates and its registration and departmental recognition supported the claim, the tax officer could not insist on separate remittance proof from the assessee. That would undermine the Government-approved method of tax deduction at source. The amounts deducted were therefore required to be credited and adjusted against the assessee&#039;s sales tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>