<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 338 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158448</link>
    <description>Where turnover tax liability is not admitted in the returns, the assessing authority must first complete assessment in accordance with law before issuing a demand notice. A demand cannot be founded on an unascertained liability, and proposed penalty proceedings cannot stand independently when the underlying demand is procedurally unsustainable. The notices were contrary to fair procedure and natural justice and were liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:00:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 338 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158448</link>
      <description>Where turnover tax liability is not admitted in the returns, the assessing authority must first complete assessment in accordance with law before issuing a demand notice. A demand cannot be founded on an unascertained liability, and proposed penalty proceedings cannot stand independently when the underlying demand is procedurally unsustainable. The notices were contrary to fair procedure and natural justice and were liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>