<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Valuation Dispute Over Packaged Water u/r 4A; Appellant Must Pre-Deposit 25% of Duty Due to Price Evidence Issues.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15389</link>
    <description>Valuation as per MRP under Rule 4A of CE Rules – packaged drinking water - the declaration of retail sale price by the appellant is not borne out from the evidences available on records - the appellant directed to make a pre-deposit of 25% of duty - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:23:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:23:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Valuation Dispute Over Packaged Water u/r 4A; Appellant Must Pre-Deposit 25% of Duty Due to Price Evidence Issues.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15389</link>
      <description>Valuation as per MRP under Rule 4A of CE Rules – packaged drinking water - the declaration of retail sale price by the appellant is not borne out from the evidences available on records - the appellant directed to make a pre-deposit of 25% of duty - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:23:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>