<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1165 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238710</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order directing a 50% deposit of the tax amount claimed by the revenue. The appellant argued that incentives received were not subject to service tax, seeking a waiver of the entire tax component. However, the Court upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decision to stay 50% of the tax amount, emphasizing the need for a detailed examination of the contractual relationship and the balance between undue hardship and revenue interests. The appellant was directed to deposit the amount as per the CESTAT&#039;s order within one month.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1165 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238710</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order directing a 50% deposit of the tax amount claimed by the revenue. The appellant argued that incentives received were not subject to service tax, seeking a waiver of the entire tax component. However, the Court upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decision to stay 50% of the tax amount, emphasizing the need for a detailed examination of the contractual relationship and the balance between undue hardship and revenue interests. The appellant was directed to deposit the amount as per the CESTAT&#039;s order within one month.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>