<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1162 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the refund claim was time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1994. It determined that the levy was not unconstitutional but without authority of law, requiring the refund claim to be processed under Section 11B. The Tribunal rejected the refund claim, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions and Supreme Court principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1162 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the refund claim was time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1994. It determined that the levy was not unconstitutional but without authority of law, requiring the refund claim to be processed under Section 11B. The Tribunal rejected the refund claim, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions and Supreme Court principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>