<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1159 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed the denial of Cenvat credit for Service Tax paid on group medical insurance of employees and their dependents, noting the lack of a clear legal mandate for insuring dependents. It also discussed the eligibility of Cenvat credit for Product Liability Insurance, emphasizing previous decisions supporting such credits. The judgment highlighted compliance with record-keeping requirements but noted a time-barred demand for one appeal. The Tribunal directed a deposit for one appeal and exempted the remaining balance from pre-deposit. Both stay petitions were disposed of, considering the issues comprehensively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1159 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed the denial of Cenvat credit for Service Tax paid on group medical insurance of employees and their dependents, noting the lack of a clear legal mandate for insuring dependents. It also discussed the eligibility of Cenvat credit for Product Liability Insurance, emphasizing previous decisions supporting such credits. The judgment highlighted compliance with record-keeping requirements but noted a time-barred demand for one appeal. The Tribunal directed a deposit for one appeal and exempted the remaining balance from pre-deposit. Both stay petitions were disposed of, considering the issues comprehensively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>