<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1150 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238695</link>
    <description>The appeals were listed for urgent out-of-turn hearing on the contention that Notification No. 30/2004-CE would not apply to imported goods because of the proviso relating to CENVAT credit. The matter was fixed for out-of-turn hearing, status quo was directed to be maintained until disposal of the appeals, and no final decision was rendered on the substantive applicability issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1150 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238695</link>
      <description>The appeals were listed for urgent out-of-turn hearing on the contention that Notification No. 30/2004-CE would not apply to imported goods because of the proviso relating to CENVAT credit. The matter was fixed for out-of-turn hearing, status quo was directed to be maintained until disposal of the appeals, and no final decision was rendered on the substantive applicability issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>