<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1148 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238693</link>
    <description>The tribunal found no merit in waiving the pre-deposit requirement for the appellant&#039;s appeal due to their involvement in a fraudulent claim of drawback. The appellant was directed to deposit the entire penalty amount within four weeks. The judgment highlights the seriousness of abetment in fraudulent activities and stresses the importance of complying with penalty requirements, with implications for connected parties emphasized by the tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1148 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238693</link>
      <description>The tribunal found no merit in waiving the pre-deposit requirement for the appellant&#039;s appeal due to their involvement in a fraudulent claim of drawback. The appellant was directed to deposit the entire penalty amount within four weeks. The judgment highlights the seriousness of abetment in fraudulent activities and stresses the importance of complying with penalty requirements, with implications for connected parties emphasized by the tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>