<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1146 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238691</link>
    <description>Clearances are not treated as provisional assessment under Rule 9B unless the statutory procedure is actually followed, including an order by the proper officer, execution of bond, and maintenance of provisional records pending finalisation; pending classification proceedings and a bank guarantee do not suffice. The Board circular dated 24.9.92 on HDPE tapes, using the word &quot;henceforth,&quot; was held to operate prospectively and could not be applied to the earlier disputed period. The classification under heading 3920.32 was therefore not available for that past period, and the original authority&#039;s view was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1146 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238691</link>
      <description>Clearances are not treated as provisional assessment under Rule 9B unless the statutory procedure is actually followed, including an order by the proper officer, execution of bond, and maintenance of provisional records pending finalisation; pending classification proceedings and a bank guarantee do not suffice. The Board circular dated 24.9.92 on HDPE tapes, using the word &quot;henceforth,&quot; was held to operate prospectively and could not be applied to the earlier disputed period. The classification under heading 3920.32 was therefore not available for that past period, and the original authority&#039;s view was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>