<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1138 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238683</link>
    <description>The Tribunal clarified that the predeposit amount in the Stay Order applied to all appeals, not just one, correcting a clerical error to Rs.1,82,22,414. The Revenue&#039;s applications for modification were dismissed as the original order already considered all applications. The Tribunal emphasized its authority in modifying stay orders, considering legal precedents and factual disputes on cenvat credit eligibility for items like MS angles and channels. The decision highlighted the need for thorough examination and adherence to established legal principles in such matters, ultimately upholding the original Stay Order terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1138 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238683</link>
      <description>The Tribunal clarified that the predeposit amount in the Stay Order applied to all appeals, not just one, correcting a clerical error to Rs.1,82,22,414. The Revenue&#039;s applications for modification were dismissed as the original order already considered all applications. The Tribunal emphasized its authority in modifying stay orders, considering legal precedents and factual disputes on cenvat credit eligibility for items like MS angles and channels. The decision highlighted the need for thorough examination and adherence to established legal principles in such matters, ultimately upholding the original Stay Order terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>