<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1124 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238669</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the AO&#039;s decision to disallow 25% of credit card expenses, rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim that they were for business promotion. The ITAT restored the AO&#039;s disallowance amount of Rs.3,37,245. Regarding business promotion expenses, the ITAT found the disallowance unjustified and remanded the issue for further examination. The ITAT also directed the AO to verify if prior period expenses were ascertained during the relevant assessment year. The ITAT partly allowed both appeals, addressing each issue raised by the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1124 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238669</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the AO&#039;s decision to disallow 25% of credit card expenses, rejecting the assessee&#039;s claim that they were for business promotion. The ITAT restored the AO&#039;s disallowance amount of Rs.3,37,245. Regarding business promotion expenses, the ITAT found the disallowance unjustified and remanded the issue for further examination. The ITAT also directed the AO to verify if prior period expenses were ascertained during the relevant assessment year. The ITAT partly allowed both appeals, addressing each issue raised by the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>