https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238647 The judge upheld the lower authorities' decision to reject the appellant's refund claim for Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid on imported goods due to a mismatch in thickness between the imported goods and those sold domestically. Despite the appellant's argument that the assorted sizes of the imported goods corresponded to the various thicknesses in domestic sales invoices, the judge found insufficient evidence to support this claim. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and the early hearing application was disposed of, affirming the rejection of the refund claim. en-us Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jun 2015 11:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238647 The judge upheld the lower authorities' decision to reject the appellant's refund claim for Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid on imported goods due to a mismatch in thickness between the imported goods and those sold domestically. Despite the appellant's argument that the assorted sizes of the imported goods corresponded to the various thicknesses in domestic sales invoices, the judge found insufficient evidence to support this claim. As a result, the appeal was dismissed, and the early hearing application was disposed of, affirming the rejection of the refund claim. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238647