<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 401 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158426</link>
    <description>Subsidy paid by the Government to fertilizer manufacturers was held not to form part of &quot;turnover&quot; under section 2(i) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948. The court reasoned that turnover covers the price paid by the purchaser in a bilateral sale transaction, whereas the government subsidy was not consideration from the buyer but support intended to keep fertilizer prices reasonable and ensure a fair return to manufacturers. The phrase &quot;aggregate amount&quot; in the Act was held not to alter this position, as it conveyed the same sense as the earlier statutory expression. The subsidy was therefore outside the sales tax net.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:59:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 401 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158426</link>
      <description>Subsidy paid by the Government to fertilizer manufacturers was held not to form part of &quot;turnover&quot; under section 2(i) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948. The court reasoned that turnover covers the price paid by the purchaser in a bilateral sale transaction, whereas the government subsidy was not consideration from the buyer but support intended to keep fertilizer prices reasonable and ensure a fair return to manufacturers. The phrase &quot;aggregate amount&quot; in the Act was held not to alter this position, as it conveyed the same sense as the earlier statutory expression. The subsidy was therefore outside the sales tax net.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>