<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 501 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158421</link>
    <description>Penalty proceedings based on stock variation and other inspection defects require a fair opportunity to meet the allegations, including access to seized documents needed for defence. Where the department retains the stock register until after the penalty process is completed, the assessee cannot effectively controvert the charge. The text states that passing penalty orders without furnishing the very register relied on for defence amounted to denial of an effective opportunity and breach of natural justice, and the resulting penalty orders were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:19:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 501 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158421</link>
      <description>Penalty proceedings based on stock variation and other inspection defects require a fair opportunity to meet the allegations, including access to seized documents needed for defence. Where the department retains the stock register until after the penalty process is completed, the assessee cannot effectively controvert the charge. The text states that passing penalty orders without furnishing the very register relied on for defence amounted to denial of an effective opportunity and breach of natural justice, and the resulting penalty orders were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>