<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (12) TMI 350 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158418</link>
    <description>A Commissioner&#039;s determination under section 42-B of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 binds subordinate authorities on rate of tax, but it does not bind the appellate forum. The Tribunal was therefore required to examine afresh the taxability and exempt status of compressed woollen felts above 3 mm thickness, including whether they satisfied the test of pliability for exemption. Clarificatory orders or circular-style interpretations represent the Government&#039;s view only and cannot foreclose judicial or appellate scrutiny. The Tribunal&#039;s refusal to decide the matter on merits was held unjustified, and the issue had to be reconsidered in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:46:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (12) TMI 350 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158418</link>
      <description>A Commissioner&#039;s determination under section 42-B of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 binds subordinate authorities on rate of tax, but it does not bind the appellate forum. The Tribunal was therefore required to examine afresh the taxability and exempt status of compressed woollen felts above 3 mm thickness, including whether they satisfied the test of pliability for exemption. Clarificatory orders or circular-style interpretations represent the Government&#039;s view only and cannot foreclose judicial or appellate scrutiny. The Tribunal&#039;s refusal to decide the matter on merits was held unjustified, and the issue had to be reconsidered in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>