<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 412 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158412</link>
    <description>Broom made of soonk was covered by the Schedule to the exemption notification issued under section 4(a) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, so no sales tax was payable on that commodity from the notified date. Circulars and consequential notices demanding tax on the same goods were inconsistent with the exemption and could not override it. The demand was therefore untenable, and the circular and notices were quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:32:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 412 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158412</link>
      <description>Broom made of soonk was covered by the Schedule to the exemption notification issued under section 4(a) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, so no sales tax was payable on that commodity from the notified date. Circulars and consequential notices demanding tax on the same goods were inconsistent with the exemption and could not override it. The demand was therefore untenable, and the circular and notices were quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>