https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238633 The case involved a dispute over the availing of CENVAT Credit on various inputs used in manufacturing structurals. The Applicant agreed to deposit the disputed amount for the normal period of limitation, set at Rs. 1.73 lakh, which the Revenue accepted. The Tribunal directed the Applicant to make the pre-deposit within six weeks, with the balance dues waived upon compliance. The judgment emphasized the need for pre-deposit in cases concerning the normal period of limitation and relied on precedent to establish a consistent approach. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238633 The case involved a dispute over the availing of CENVAT Credit on various inputs used in manufacturing structurals. The Applicant agreed to deposit the disputed amount for the normal period of limitation, set at Rs. 1.73 lakh, which the Revenue accepted. The Tribunal directed the Applicant to make the pre-deposit within six weeks, with the balance dues waived upon compliance. The judgment emphasized the need for pre-deposit in cases concerning the normal period of limitation and relied on precedent to establish a consistent approach. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238633