<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1052 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238597</link>
    <description>The Court criticized the Tribunal&#039;s strict approach in rejecting an application for condonation of delay in filing appeals before the Customs, Excise, Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. Emphasizing the importance of substantial justice over technicalities, the Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order, condoned the 309-day delay, and allowed the appeal to proceed. The judgment highlighted the need for a liberal approach in such matters, ensuring equality before the law and a fair hearing for all parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1052 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238597</link>
      <description>The Court criticized the Tribunal&#039;s strict approach in rejecting an application for condonation of delay in filing appeals before the Customs, Excise, Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. Emphasizing the importance of substantial justice over technicalities, the Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order, condoned the 309-day delay, and allowed the appeal to proceed. The judgment highlighted the need for a liberal approach in such matters, ensuring equality before the law and a fair hearing for all parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>