<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1050 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238595</link>
    <description>The petition seeking sanction of a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, was granted. The court approved the amalgamation of the Transferor Company with the Transferee Company, subject to compliance with statutory requirements. The court found no valid objections against the scheme, with the Regional Director highlighting post-amalgamation employment continuity and procedures for changing the name of the Transferee Company. Sanction was granted, and the Transferor Company agreed to deposit a sum in the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator. The petition was allowed, with further proceedings to follow.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1050 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238595</link>
      <description>The petition seeking sanction of a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, was granted. The court approved the amalgamation of the Transferor Company with the Transferee Company, subject to compliance with statutory requirements. The court found no valid objections against the scheme, with the Regional Director highlighting post-amalgamation employment continuity and procedures for changing the name of the Transferee Company. Sanction was granted, and the Transferor Company agreed to deposit a sum in the Common Pool Fund of the Official Liquidator. The petition was allowed, with further proceedings to follow.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>