<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1048 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238593</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Central Excise Appeal, setting aside the orders of the CESTAT due to discrepancies in the authentication process by the Committee of Commissioners. Emphasizing procedural compliance and limited judicial review scope, the Court remanded the matter for a decision on merits in accordance with the law, highlighting the importance of due application of mind in appeal authorization.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1048 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238593</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Central Excise Appeal, setting aside the orders of the CESTAT due to discrepancies in the authentication process by the Committee of Commissioners. Emphasizing procedural compliance and limited judicial review scope, the Court remanded the matter for a decision on merits in accordance with the law, highlighting the importance of due application of mind in appeal authorization.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>