<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1031 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238576</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking compliance with directions in a previous judgment regarding the reopening of assessment for the year 2006-07 under section 147. The petitioner&#039;s challenge on grounds of limitation, change in opinion, and necessity of a &quot;speaking order&quot; was rejected as no objections were initially filed. The court directed the petitioner to submit objections within one month and ordered the respondent to finalize the assessment as per the law. Additionally, the court dismissed the appeal against the previous verdict, stating that no writ could be issued to implement the judgment and emphasized the importance of timely finalization of assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1031 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238576</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking compliance with directions in a previous judgment regarding the reopening of assessment for the year 2006-07 under section 147. The petitioner&#039;s challenge on grounds of limitation, change in opinion, and necessity of a &quot;speaking order&quot; was rejected as no objections were initially filed. The court directed the petitioner to submit objections within one month and ordered the respondent to finalize the assessment as per the law. Additionally, the court dismissed the appeal against the previous verdict, stating that no writ could be issued to implement the judgment and emphasized the importance of timely finalization of assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>