<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1026 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238571</link>
    <description>The court rejected all pleas of the petitioner challenging the validity of the notice issued under Section 142A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the applicability of Section 50C. The court held that the notices were permissible under the Act and that the AO&#039;s actions were justified. The court dismissed the writ petition at the admission stage, stating that the AO was within his powers, and the petition was premature as no final decision on reassessment had been made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1026 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238571</link>
      <description>The court rejected all pleas of the petitioner challenging the validity of the notice issued under Section 142A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the applicability of Section 50C. The court held that the notices were permissible under the Act and that the AO&#039;s actions were justified. The court dismissed the writ petition at the admission stage, stating that the AO was within his powers, and the petition was premature as no final decision on reassessment had been made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>