<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Misdeclaration Allegations: Samples Not Tested Can&#039;t Solely Support Conclusions Under Notification No.21/2002 Concessional Duty Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15300</link>
    <description>Benefit of Notification No.21/2002 – Concessional Rate of Duty - allegation of misdeclaration of goods - when samples have been drawn and have not sent for testing, in that case, inference cannot be drawn on the basis of mere research - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:21:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:21:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Misdeclaration Allegations: Samples Not Tested Can&#039;t Solely Support Conclusions Under Notification No.21/2002 Concessional Duty Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15300</link>
      <description>Benefit of Notification No.21/2002 – Concessional Rate of Duty - allegation of misdeclaration of goods - when samples have been drawn and have not sent for testing, in that case, inference cannot be drawn on the basis of mere research - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:21:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=15300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>