<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1017 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238562</link>
    <description>Interim relief was sought in a service tax dispute concerning supplies to SEZ units during the gap between exemption notifications. The same issue had already been decided by the same Bench in an earlier matter, and that view was followed without departure. On that basis, the applicant was found to have made out a case for protection pending appeal, and waiver of pre-deposit was granted with recovery stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1017 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238562</link>
      <description>Interim relief was sought in a service tax dispute concerning supplies to SEZ units during the gap between exemption notifications. The same issue had already been decided by the same Bench in an earlier matter, and that view was followed without departure. On that basis, the applicant was found to have made out a case for protection pending appeal, and waiver of pre-deposit was granted with recovery stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>