<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 1003 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238548</link>
    <description>False description of exported monitors as CRT Data Display Monitors was found established on the basis of technical material, statements and website specifications, showing the goods were VGA, XGA or SXGA colour monitors. The DEPB credit obtained on that basis was held unavailable, and recovery of duty with interest was sustained in principle; the fraudulent misdescription also supported invocation of the extended period. A later public notice amending the DEPB entry was treated as prospective, not retrospective, so it could not validate past exports. Redemption fine on goods already exported was set aside, while the penalties were reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 1003 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238548</link>
      <description>False description of exported monitors as CRT Data Display Monitors was found established on the basis of technical material, statements and website specifications, showing the goods were VGA, XGA or SXGA colour monitors. The DEPB credit obtained on that basis was held unavailable, and recovery of duty with interest was sustained in principle; the fraudulent misdescription also supported invocation of the extended period. A later public notice amending the DEPB entry was treated as prospective, not retrospective, so it could not validate past exports. Redemption fine on goods already exported was set aside, while the penalties were reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>