<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 992 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238537</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the interest liability on the appellants under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, even prior to 11.05.01. The judgment clarified that the amendment did not eliminate interest liability for cases involving fraud, collusion, or misstatement. The decision provided a detailed analysis of the legal provisions and established the continued applicability of interest under Section 11AB pre and post 11.05.01.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 992 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238537</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the interest liability on the appellants under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, even prior to 11.05.01. The judgment clarified that the amendment did not eliminate interest liability for cases involving fraud, collusion, or misstatement. The decision provided a detailed analysis of the legal provisions and established the continued applicability of interest under Section 11AB pre and post 11.05.01.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>