https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238535 The Tribunal, per P.K. Das, ruled in favor of the applicant, granting a waiver of the duty amount, interest, and penalty under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal considered precedents establishing that certain goods were not excisable, thus exempting the applicant from the liability. Citing decisions from High Courts and relevant cases, the Tribunal stayed the recovery process, allowing the applicant to appeal without making the payment of Rs. 97,63,007/- demanded for the period May 2006 to August 2011. en-us Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Oct 2013 07:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238535 The Tribunal, per P.K. Das, ruled in favor of the applicant, granting a waiver of the duty amount, interest, and penalty under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal considered precedents establishing that certain goods were not excisable, thus exempting the applicant from the liability. Citing decisions from High Courts and relevant cases, the Tribunal stayed the recovery process, allowing the applicant to appeal without making the payment of Rs. 97,63,007/- demanded for the period May 2006 to August 2011. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238535