<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 989 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238534</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the total waiver of pre-deposit, ruling that services provided by dealers post-sale did not qualify as input services for vehicle manufacturing based on the dealer agreement terms. Applicants were directed to deposit 50% of the confirmed duty amount within eight weeks, with a waiver on the remaining amount if timely deposited. Recovery of the remaining amount was stayed pending appeal, with compliance required by a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 07:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 989 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238534</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the total waiver of pre-deposit, ruling that services provided by dealers post-sale did not qualify as input services for vehicle manufacturing based on the dealer agreement terms. Applicants were directed to deposit 50% of the confirmed duty amount within eight weeks, with a waiver on the remaining amount if timely deposited. Recovery of the remaining amount was stayed pending appeal, with compliance required by a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>