<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 957 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238502</link>
    <description>Separate billing of material and labour in tyre re-treading services, together with conflicting coordinate Bench views on the scope of Notification No. 12/2003-ST, supported a bona fide dispute on valuation and taxability. On that prima facie basis, interim protection was justified, and waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery was granted pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 957 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238502</link>
      <description>Separate billing of material and labour in tyre re-treading services, together with conflicting coordinate Bench views on the scope of Notification No. 12/2003-ST, supported a bona fide dispute on valuation and taxability. On that prima facie basis, interim protection was justified, and waiver of pre-deposit with stay of recovery was granted pending disposal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>