<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 950 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238495</link>
    <description>The bench allowed the restoration applications of a central PSU for appeals dismissed due to lack of COD clearance. Despite significant delay in filing, the bench considered the undeniable COD clearance intimation and the lack of representation during dismissal. The appellant&#039;s argument, supported by a Supreme Court ruling, that PSUs no longer require COD clearance for appeals before the Tribunal was acknowledged. Consequently, both appeals were reinstated, emphasizing the importance of COD clearance intimation over the delay in filing restoration applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 950 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238495</link>
      <description>The bench allowed the restoration applications of a central PSU for appeals dismissed due to lack of COD clearance. Despite significant delay in filing, the bench considered the undeniable COD clearance intimation and the lack of representation during dismissal. The appellant&#039;s argument, supported by a Supreme Court ruling, that PSUs no longer require COD clearance for appeals before the Tribunal was acknowledged. Consequently, both appeals were reinstated, emphasizing the importance of COD clearance intimation over the delay in filing restoration applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>