<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 939 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238484</link>
    <description>The appellate authority ruled that cut flowers are not excisable goods, thus excise duty cannot be levied. The judgment clarified that cut flowers are not classified as excisable goods under the Central Excise Tariff Act, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 939 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238484</link>
      <description>The appellate authority ruled that cut flowers are not excisable goods, thus excise duty cannot be levied. The judgment clarified that cut flowers are not classified as excisable goods under the Central Excise Tariff Act, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>