<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (10) TMI 928 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238473</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the land in question was agricultural land, not a business asset. The profit from its sale should be treated as capital gains, not business income. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, with no basis for interest levy under Section 234B or penalties under Sections 271(1)(b) and 271(1)(c) of the IT Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=333244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (10) TMI 928 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238473</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the land in question was agricultural land, not a business asset. The profit from its sale should be treated as capital gains, not business income. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, with no basis for interest levy under Section 234B or penalties under Sections 271(1)(b) and 271(1)(c) of the IT Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>